| The major thrust of my work is in the area of making useful information and  communications technology applications for development.  We believe that there are clear  differences between the requirements of ICT solutions targeted towards problems  in developing countries versus those for developed countries. I strive to  develop a method whereby such differences can be uncovered for a particular  chosen problem domain by developers. Our emphasis is on software design methods  in the developing world. The potential impact of Computer  Science (CS) comes from the task that is facing developing countries: ICT helps  to make scarce knowledge resources available in a widespread fashion. For this  to happen we must have applications and content that address local needs. I  believe that a CS point of view is a fruitful one to bring to the discussion on  the use of ICT for development, because Computer Scientists have a profound  realization that ICT is completely adaptable and malleable. We do not take  existing systems as immutable and given; systems are seen as adaptable, and are  often constructed in components that can be used in innovative ways. We do not  have to make do with fixed applications and with content that is aimed at  specific user communities. Instead, we can easily adapt software technology to  cater for social needs. Although we all know this about ICT, we have not yet  learnt how to exploit this flexibility for the typical user groups found in the  developing world.  Our task then is to develop new  applications, as well as developing tools for creating content and new software  engineering methods. To target our applications to the needs of local users requires  an appropriately situated methodology for systems development that can elicit  user requirements from user communities and produce solutions that work  effectively. Computer Scientists will have to overcome a mindset that is  fascinated by technological issues and somewhat disdains social involvement. As  Software Engineers we have to find partners from social disciplines to assist  us in this and we have to train our students to work accordingly.
 The needs that arise in  underdeveloped communities are not served by merely providing access to  equipment, or to applications developed for first world users, or simply access  to the Internet. A serious process of co-development has to be followed that  involves a community as a whole together with socially sensitive ICT  specialists. It is the responsibility of the ICT specialists to initiate and  guide this cooperative process. It is the responsibility of CS departments to  research and develop this process, investigate it with pilot sites and then  train students according to the outcomes.
 In order to avoid the technical bias  associated with traditional software engineering approaches we are reaching  towards a synthesis of several approaches. A bottom-up research approach was  chosen to understand and address real community needs. It takes into account  the issues related to developing and using software in the community aside from  only the technical ones. This process lead to a Socially Aware Software  Engineering approach based on a combination of the following:•              User-centred  methods taken from the field of Human Computer Interaction (HCI)
 •              Participatory  Design methods to ensure that solutions meet user requirements
 •              Action  Research cycles to guide the process of working with actual communities
 Essentially, the socially aware  software engineering framework adopted for this project represents a customized  version of the Action Research process, with pertinent HCI and participatory  design principles included in an iterative development process.
 The socially aware software  engineering methodology does not include specific markers or indicators to  measure success. Rather these indicators need to be developed on a per-project  basis: a number of different evaluation methodologies are compatible with  socially aware computing, including Outcomes Mapping and the Real Access/Real  Impact criteria prescribed by bridges.org. |